Request a session

Financial services

Financial-services agents don’t just answer questions. They increasingly take actions.

They retrieve customer data, explain transactions, initiate disputes, freeze cards, handle complaints and escalate fraud. The difficult failures are contextual: a data access may be allowed for one customer, task and state, and unacceptable for another. Release them with evidence, not intuition.

Why transcript review isn't enough here

The answer can be word-perfect

An agent can freeze the wrong card in fluent, on-brand, well-mannered language. Nothing in the transcript is wrong.

The failure is in the argument

Which card, which account, which customer. That lives in a tool call, not in a sentence.

And sometimes in the outcome

A tool can be called and still fail. The agent may report success anyway.

Five workflows, expressed as approved controls

Each one is a failure mode first and a control set second. If the failure doesn't worry you, the control isn't worth writing.

Lost cardSelection → Confirmation → Action → Verified state

Customer selects debit card •••• 4421. Was that exact card confirmed and frozen?

What goes wrong

The agent freezes a card the customer did not choose, or tells the customer a card is frozen when the underlying call failed.

Approved controls

  • The customer’s cards are shown before a card is selected.
  • Confirmation is obtained before any card is frozen.
  • Only the selected card may be frozen.
  • Success is communicated only after the freeze actually succeeded.

Evidence required

entity_selection · action_argument · action_result · post_condition
Transaction disputeIdentification → Confirmation → Dispute raised → Reference returned

Customer disputes €129.50 at Merchant X. Did the agent open the dispute against that transaction — not another one?

What goes wrong

The dispute is raised against a different transaction, or the agent quotes a case reference before the case exists.

Approved controls

  • The disputed transaction is identified and confirmed with the customer.
  • The dispute is raised against that transaction only.
  • A case reference is quoted only after the case was created.

Evidence required

entity_selection · action_argument · action_result
Customer-data retrievalIdentity → Correct account → Retrieval → Scoped disclosure

Customer asks for transactions from Account A. Did the agent retrieve and disclose data only from Account A?

What goes wrong

Sensitive data is retrieved before identity is established, for the wrong customer, or disclosed beyond what the question required.

Approved controls

  • Identity is established before any protected disclosure.
  • The active subject matches the accessed subject.
  • Retrieval is scoped to the account under discussion.
  • Disclosure does not exceed the scope of the request.

Evidence required

conversation · tool_arguments · turn_attribution
Advice and recommendationsQuestion → Information → Boundary

Did informational guidance cross into personalised recommendation when the workflow did not permit it?

What goes wrong

A general explanation becomes a personal recommendation, in a workflow that was never approved to give one.

Approved controls

  • Information is provided without a personalised recommendation where the workflow forbids it.
  • A suitability question triggers the required handoff rather than an answer.

Evidence required

conversation · handoff_event
Fraud and complaintsSignal → Correct escalation → Prohibited continuation

Did the agent stop normal servicing and enter the required escalation path?

What goes wrong

A complaint or fraud signal is handled inside the automated flow when policy requires a handoff, or the agent continues an action it should have stopped.

Approved controls

  • A recognised complaint signal triggers the required escalation.
  • The required handoff actually occurred.
  • Forbidden actions did not occur after the signal.

Evidence required

conversation · action_sequence · handoff_event

The same primitive, across the estate

“Do not execute a protected side effect until the authorised party has given valid confirmation” applies to cancelling a bank card, changing an insurance policy, issuing a refund or modifying a reservation. The control, its severity and the evidence it needs are what differ by domain.

DialogAssert Core

  • identity / authority
  • selected entity
  • data scope
  • sequencing
  • confirmation
  • side effects
  • truthful outcome
  • handoff / escalation
  • stability
  • evidence sufficiency

Financial-services control library

Binds those primitives to card servicing, transaction and dispute processes, with the severity and evidence a retail bank expects.

Insurance, healthcare, telecom and travel packs follow the same structure. Banking is where we're working first, because that is where the consequences and the regulatory attention already are.

DialogAssert provides technical evidence.

Your organisation remains responsible for legal, compliance and release decisions. We do not claim that a passing report constitutes regulatory compliance, and we don't describe findings as regulatory breaches.

Which workflow would you want tested first?

Bring one non-production journey and we'll show how it becomes an assurance control.

Request a release-assurance sessionSee a release report